Re: Our SVN layout is not that smart OR should we change the SVN layout? (take 2)
On Sun, Jun 25, 2006, Eddy Petrişor wrote:
> Since there was nobody speaking against this, I will make the necessary
Asking on a Saturday and acting on Sunday morning? ITYM "nobody had
time to speak against it."
I do not like the idea of branches/tags and trunk at all, it
does not have any meaning. What we have in Debian is unstable and
sarge/etch/etc., and the other projects I know (SDL packagking, Allegro
packaging) use unstable/ as the trunk repository, too, and branch when
It's not that it can't be reverted, or that it really matters, but
well, leaving some time for discussion and planning would have been
wiser and more respectful. For instance, you broke svn-buildpackage for
all my packages.