[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Our SVN layout is not that smart OR should we change the SVN layout? (take 2)

On Sat, Jun 24, 2006 at 10:23:24AM +0300, Eddy Petri??or wrote:
> One of the goals of the team, IMO, is to have at least a common
> standard for what should our packages provide, thus I feel that all
> games should have correct watch files (where applicable) menu files
> and desktop files.

I agree.

> Adding support for all of these at once for all packages it is nearly
> impossible without filling the harddisk with all branches and
> realeases of all the games.
> Thus, I propose the following layout:

Looks good to me.

> P.S.: shouldn't we add something like a "dropped" directory for the
> likes of "cube"? I thought of deleting it, but it would have the risk
> of people not reusing the work which has been done in case a new
> voluteer appears.

IMO this must indeed be documented, but svn is not the place to do so.  The
wiki is much better for that I think.  Of course it must be in a place where
people look before they start packaging.  I would personally start packaging
at my own hd and only after that move it into svn, so for me at least that
wouldn't work anyway.  I might however check the wiki to see if it was already


I encourage people to send encrypted e-mail (see http://www.gnupg.org).
If you have problems reading my e-mail, use a better reader.
Please send the central message of e-mails as plain text
   in the message body, not as HTML and definitely not as MS Word.
Please do not use the MS Word format for attachments either.
For more information, see

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: