Re: Bug#587886: future of maintaining of the bootloader LILO

[Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>]

On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 12:20:55PM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Ian Jackson writes ("Bug#587886: future of maintaining of the bootloader LILO"):
> > No, I don't think so.  There's nothing more to be said.
> > 
> > > [for reference:
> > > 
> > >  A. lilo should be removed.  In the meantime, William is to be sole
> > >     maintainer of lilo.  His promised request to the ftp team to
> > >     remove lilo should be honoured, after which the ftp masters should
> > >     not permit Matt and/or Joachim to reupload a new lilo package.
> > > 
> > >  B. lilo should be retained in unstable.  Matt and Joachim are to be
> > >     joint maintainers of lilo.  
> ...
> > I vote:
> 
> I'm changing my vote as follows:
> 
>    1: B
>    2: A
>    3: SQ

I'd like to point out that neither of your votes are signed.


Kurt