Bug#587886: future of maintaining of the bootloader LILO
Ian Jackson writes ("Bug#587886: future of maintaining of the bootloader LILO"):
> No, I don't think so. There's nothing more to be said.
> > [for reference:
> > A. lilo should be removed. In the meantime, William is to be sole
> > maintainer of lilo. His promised request to the ftp team to
> > remove lilo should be honoured, after which the ftp masters should
> > not permit Matt and/or Joachim to reupload a new lilo package.
> > B. lilo should be retained in unstable. Matt and Joachim are to be
> > joint maintainers of lilo.
> I vote:
I'm changing my vote as follows: