[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#587886: future of maintaining of the bootloader LILO

Ian Jackson writes ("Bug#587886: future of maintaining of the bootloader LILO"):
> No, I don't think so.  There's nothing more to be said.
> > [for reference:
> > 
> >  A. lilo should be removed.  In the meantime, William is to be sole
> >     maintainer of lilo.  His promised request to the ftp team to
> >     remove lilo should be honoured, after which the ftp masters should
> >     not permit Matt and/or Joachim to reupload a new lilo package.
> > 
> >  B. lilo should be retained in unstable.  Matt and Joachim are to be
> >     joint maintainers of lilo.  
> I vote:

I'm changing my vote as follows:

   1: B
   2: A
   3: SQ


Reply to: