Bug#587886: future of maintaining of the bootloader LILO

[Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>]

Don Armstrong writes ("Bug#587886: future of maintaining of the bootloader LILO"):
> Is there any objection to starting the voting process on this issue
> with the options presented in
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=587886#55 ?

No, I don't think so.  There's nothing more to be said.

> [for reference:
> 
>  A. lilo should be removed.  In the meantime, William is to be sole
>     maintainer of lilo.  His promised request to the ftp team to
>     remove lilo should be honoured, after which the ftp masters should
>     not permit Matt and/or Joachim to reupload a new lilo package.
> 
>  B. lilo should be retained in unstable.  Matt and Joachim are to be
>     joint maintainers of lilo.  

I vote:
  1: A
  2: B
  3: SQ

Ian.