Bug#587886: future of maintaining of the bootloader LILO

[Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

* Don Armstrong (don@debian.org) [101129 12:06]:
> [for reference:
> 
>  A. lilo should be removed.  In the meantime, William is to be sole
>     maintainer of lilo.  His promised request to the ftp team to
>     remove lilo should be honoured, after which the ftp masters should
>     not permit Matt and/or Joachim to reupload a new lilo package.
> 
>  B. lilo should be retained in unstable.  Matt and Joachim are to be
>     joint maintainers of lilo.  
> 
> ]


I vote: B, A, further discussion 


(and obviously in case B is the decision, the maintainers are still
allowed to request removal any time they consider it appropriate; also
for reference, I don't see so bad issues with lilo that we need to
enforce removal from the archive despite there are maintainers willing
to take care of lilo (usual RC bug procedures of course still apply);
and last not least please take care of the current release process
with new uploads to unstable at this time of the cycle)


Andi
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkz1MNAACgkQmdOZoew2oYVwVQCgqQdQjcC3PSIOiA+4glXkz7If
qGUAoKA8j8ztb8x2hBAhOnT7WBb5WNNZ
=LEI/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----