Re: Bug#436093: Please decide on the "ownership" of the developers reference
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 12:20:47PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > So I would give Andi the benefit of the doubt, that the "no commits without
> > discussion" is not intended to give him *personal* veto power over any
> > changes, but rather to ensure that any changes get multiple eyeballs on them
> > before being committed.
> Definitly. I don't think I have a personal veto power on content
> (technically spoken, the only real veto power I see on the content is by
> the tech ctte, though of course I would make sure content matches
> reality, i.e. we don't describe stuff as ok which we know the
> ftp-masters will reject). I just see it as "procedural veto" to make
> sure the content is reviewed enough. Nothing more, but also nothing
With this clarification, I'm content to confirm you as the maintainer of the
developers-reference, if you still believe that's necessary.
I also think this appeal to the TC might have been avoided entirely if you
had taken the time to calmly explain to Raphaël the reasons for this policy,
as you've now explained here. Of course people don't like to follow rules
that they don't understand the rationale for.
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.