Re: #342455

[Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>]

On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 01:46:56AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 04:40:22PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Otherwise, having access to the underlying block devices means having access
> > to meddle with anything on the LVM devices as well.

> And who says that anyone have access to the underlying device?

Er, I just asked why they wouldn't; what's the point of turning this
question around on me?  *Is* there a reason to have users in the 'disk'
group that you don't want to have access to your physical volumes?

Anyway, see my other mail for another reason one might want different perms
for dm devices.

-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
vorlon@debian.org                                   http://www.debian.org/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature