unsubscribe Dmitry Sherman dmitry@interhost.vg > On 9 בפבר׳ 2016, at 20:28, Marcin Kulisz <debian@kulisz.net> wrote: > > On 2016-02-09 12:29:02, Tim Sattarov wrote: >> Hello everyone, > > Hi, > > snip > >> Currently I use custom AMIs built with patched bootstrap-vz and using my >> own kernel, stripped down to only what is needed for EC2 and it has much >> better results. But I would love to see those changes in the official >> images as well. > > We prefer not to do any changes to kernel to be as close to mainline Debian as > we can. Main reason for this is that some day we'd like to call those AMIs > 'official Debian images' and to be able to do so we have to respect some > constrains. > >> Since I'm quite new to debian-cloud, what would be the best way to do it ? >> I will open bug for bootstrap-vz to include that fix or may be there is >> better way to fix it. >> >> But for the kernel: I believe there should be separate flavour for ec2 >> platform = new package and feature request to Debian Kernel Team. >> >> Any thoughts ? > > See above. > -- > > |_|0|_| | > |_|_|0| "Heghlu'Meh QaQ jajVam" | > |0|0|0| -------- kuLa --------- | > > gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 0x58C338B3 > 3DF1 A4DF C732 4688 38BC F121 6869 30DD 58C3 38B3
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail