Re: non-standard TCP tunings in EC2 images
>>>>> "Lucas" == Lucas Nussbaum <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
Lucas> On 20/07/16 at 19:12 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
>> I would rather propose the reverse approach, that if a change is
>> successful for cloud images, then it is a good idea to propose to
>> extend it to more use cases.
Lucas> Note that to judge if a change is successful, its rationale
Lucas> should be documented, so that you can derive a success metric
Lucas> from it. TTBOMK, the rationale for those sysctl tunings is
Lucas> not documented.
I agree that bootstrap-vz needs a lot more documentation and that as we
grow we should get in the practice of documenting any divergences.
I think that as we understand why we're making changes we'll find we are
in a much better position to discuss whether they are good ideas.