Re: emacs split up
David Schmitt wrote:
>>This might not be the most logical ordering to use for deciding which cd
>>to put software on. People will miss packages that they actually use,
>>while many packages often get installed that are never used, especially
>>when the user just chooses some package group like 'standard
>>workstation', or whatever. This kind of relativizes the whole pop-con
>>statistics, doesn't it? Usage statistics seem much more relevant to me.
> Since debian-cd is mostly concerned with installing packages, it does make
> sense to put most-often-installed packages on the first CD, doesn't it?
This is true, you are correct an that count. I withdraw the above
comment. Though somebody besides the cd team might want to wonder about
packages that get installed but not used. sounds like cruft to me. ;-)