Re: .raw extension is misleading
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 04:29:20PM +0100, Philip Hands wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-05-14 at 19:14, Richard Atterer wrote:
> > "jigdo/", not "jigdo-area/". (Not that it really matters...)
>
> I wasn't overly happy about using jigdo-area, but couldn't think of
> anything more appropriate.
>
> The reason not to call it simply "jigdo" is that the jigdo-area
> contains one or more versioned directories, each of which contains a
> jigdo and a snapshot directory, so having jigdo appear at two levels
> in the hierarchy seemed likely to give rise to confusion.
That's true.
Why not call the topmost dir "jigdo" and leave out the second one, i.e.
snapshot in "jigdo/2.2r6/snapshot/"
jigdo/template files in "jigdo/2.2r6/i386"
Or what about "cd-images"?
snapshot in "cd-images/2.2r6/snapshot/"
jigdo/template files in "cd-images/2.2r6/jigdo/i386"
Cheers,
Richard
--
__ _
|_) /| Richard Atterer | CS student at the Technische | GnuPG key:
| \/¯| http://atterer.net | Universität München, Germany | 0x888354F7
¯ '` ¯
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cd-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: