On Wed, 2002-05-15 at 22:44, jason andrade wrote: > On 15 May 2002, Philip Hands wrote: > > > I wasn't overly happy about using jigdo-area, but couldn't think of > > anything more appropriate. > > > > The reason not to call it simply "jigdo" is that the jigdo-area contains > > one or more versioned directories, each of which contains a jigdo and a > > snapshot directory, so having jigdo appear at two levels in the > > hierarchy seemed likely to give rise to confusion. > > > > I'm open to suggestions for a better name for where we keep > > jigdo/snapshot combinations, but I don't think "jigdo" is it. > > > jigdo-source So, what's supposed to go in here? The snapshot's? I did think of splitting them out separately, but I's rather nice to be able to have a single versioned directory that you can delete when it's no longer needed, and that's all of it gone. > jigdo-base > isoimage > > etc, > > -jason > -- Say no to software patents! http://petition.eurolinux.org/ |)| Philip Hands [+44 (0)20 8530 9560] http://www.hands.com/ |-| HANDS.COM Ltd. http://www.uk.debian.org/ |(| 10 Onslow Gardens, South Woodford, London E18 1NE ENGLAND
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part