On Wednesday, February 06, 2013 06:35:27 PM Steven Chamberlain wrote: > Hi, > > On 06/02/13 07:42, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > Starting with the opendkim packages in > > experimental, the package runs the test suite during build. Since I > > started doing that, it has never built on kfreebsd-i386 and > > intermittently failed on kfreebsd-amd64. > > I tried it on kfreebsd-amd64 with build deps from wheezy/sid; no > failures happened in 100 runs of the test suite. > > My first guess would be that some newer version of a build dependency > from sid is causing it. I don't have access to the porter boxes but > some things you could try are: > > * rebuilding an older opendkim package, maybe the version that's in > wheezy; see if it fails now in an up-to-date sid chroot; > > * try building in a wheezy chroot if the porterboxes have them (but you > would need libopendbx1(-dev) from sid...). > > > p.s. the GPG signature in your mail wasn't valid somehow. > > Regards, The older package doesn't run the test suite at build, so the fact that it built for wheezy/sid doesn't tell us anything, so I don't see how you get to the newer dependency theory? Thanks for looking into it. Do the porter boxes/buildds run the same kernels? Scott K P.S. Still not subscribed, so please cc me.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.