Re: Archive changes
[Archive changes: InRelease/Release files, Packages and Sources
no longer provide MD5Sum and SHA1sums, only SHA256.
Only xz-compressed files, no more gzipped versions.]
On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 04:05:34PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Colin Watson <firstname.lastname@example.org> (2016-03-16):
> > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 12:54:03AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > > Pretty sure this breaks (will break, when the change is propagated outside
> > > experimental) d-i as it stands, due to the check on all 3 checksums in
> > > net-retriever.
> > Looking at the code, I don't think that's true. It skips checksums that
> > are missing from Release, and it stops after the first checksum that it
> > successfully finds. Unless I'm looking at the wrong bit of
> > net-retriever?
> It's entirely possible I was thinking of an earlier version/approach,
> different from what got implemented in net-retriever finally after the
> last archive-side change. Apologies for any induced headscratching.
I have just tried a test install with today's armhf daily netboot
images, and net-retriever fails:
Jan 1 02:56:42 net-retriever: error: main/debian-installer/binary-armhf/Packages.xz not found in /tmp/net-retriever-1160-Release (for SHA1 checksum).
Jan 1 02:56:44 anna: WARNING **: bad d-i Packages file
Gem. Par. 28 Abs. 4 Bundesdatenschutzgesetz widerspreche ich der Nutzung
sowie der Weitergabe meiner personenbezogenen Daten für Zwecke der
Werbung sowie der Markt- oder Meinungsforschung.