Re: Archive changes
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 12:05 AM, Cyril Brulebois <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Colin Watson <email@example.com> (2016-03-16):
>> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 12:54:03AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>> > Pretty sure this breaks (will break, when the change is propagated outside
>> > experimental) d-i as it stands, due to the check on all 3 checksums in
>> > net-retriever.
>> Looking at the code, I don't think that's true. It skips checksums that
>> are missing from Release, and it stops after the first checksum that it
>> successfully finds. Unless I'm looking at the wrong bit of
> It's entirely possible I was thinking of an earlier version/approach,
> different from what got implemented in net-retriever finally after the
> last archive-side change. Apologies for any induced headscratching.
I made the change for net-retriever, and pushed to branch "sha256_only" .
Could you help to review the code, please? Thank you!
Roger Shimizu, GMT +9 Tokyo