[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Archive changes

Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org> (2016-03-16):
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 12:54:03AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Pretty sure this breaks (will break, when the change is propagated outside
> > experimental) d-i as it stands, due to the check on all 3 checksums in
> > net-retriever.
> Looking at the code, I don't think that's true.  It skips checksums that
> are missing from Release, and it stops after the first checksum that it
> successfully finds.  Unless I'm looking at the wrong bit of
> net-retriever?

It's entirely possible I was thinking of an earlier version/approach,
different from what got implemented in net-retriever finally after the
last archive-side change. Apologies for any induced headscratching.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: