[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Processed: Re: Bug#387049: closed by Loic Minier <lool@dooz.org> (Bug#387049: fixed in meta-gnome2 1:

Loïc Minier wrote:
>  I don't recall having ever threatened you of "enforcement" or with the
>  "tech-ctte".  I recall I did claim people should bring it to the ctte
>  if they disagree with my decision at the end of the discussion though,
>  as I did again lately.

They were in the mail I replied to.

>  I am not very patient in flamewars, and I consider the CTTE could be
>  used in more decisions to avoid tensions; so when I'm mentionning it,
>  it's not a weapon, it's a solution for both sids.  It's not like a
>  vote, since it's handled by mandated experts.  And I think the CTTE
>  should be triggerred before it gets too political and we already have a
>  pile of "I'll leave the project if ...".

The technical committe unfortunatly has a history of delaying and
complicating issues, and not much of a history of solving them.

see shy jo

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: