[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Processed: Re: Bug#387049: closed by Loic Minier <lool@dooz.org> (Bug#387049: fixed in meta-gnome2 1:

On Wed, Sep 20, 2006, Joey Hess wrote:
> >    In the end, the package doesn't get installed currently despite this
> >  being the wish of the package maintainer.  I'm not sure this is a good
> >  situation, and I'm not too happy that I can't enforce my decision. 
> It might help if you mentioned it to me. Without using loaded words like
> "enforce" and "tech-ctte", perhaps.

 (To be honest, I thought you would be against such a change.)

 I don't recall having ever threatened you of "enforcement" or with the
 "tech-ctte".  I recall I did claim people should bring it to the ctte
 if they disagree with my decision at the end of the discussion though,
 as I did again lately.

 I am not very patient in flamewars, and I consider the CTTE could be
 used in more decisions to avoid tensions; so when I'm mentionning it,
 it's not a weapon, it's a solution for both sids.  It's not like a
 vote, since it's handled by mandated experts.  And I think the CTTE
 should be triggerred before it gets too political and we already have a
 pile of "I'll leave the project if ...".

> If the desktop task should be installing avahi, and isn't, that can be
> addressed entirely independently of the recommends situation.

 I've just filed a bug against tasksel now.  Thanks for suggesting that
 it's still an option, and that it isn't too late.

Loïc Minier <lool@dooz.org>

Reply to: