Re: Processed: Re: Bug#387049: closed by Loic Minier <lool@dooz.org> (Bug#387049: fixed in meta-gnome2 1:2.14.3.1)
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006, Joey Hess wrote:
> > I don't recall having ever threatened you of "enforcement" or with the
> > "tech-ctte". I recall I did claim people should bring it to the ctte
> > if they disagree with my decision at the end of the discussion though,
> > as I did again lately.
> They were in the mail I replied to.
You were quoting <[🔎] 20060919200942.GN20244@bee.dooz.org> where I said
"I'm not too happy that I can't enforce my decision". This is not
even remotely threatening of "enforcing" anything towards you or
tasksel...
I also mentionned the tech-ctte as in: "I really wish my Recommends
would be honored (or debated in the tech-ctte)", this means I wish that
the discussion on pulling or not avahi is made by the tech ctte if some
people object to it; this had nothing to do with discussing the support
of Recommends in tasksel in the tech-ctte.
I'm afraid you got me wrong, and I'm sure that if you read the message
again in this light, you shouldn't see any threat whatsoever.
> The technical committe unfortunatly has a history of delaying and
> complicating issues, and not much of a history of solving them.
As I said, at least we are not losing time in useless flamewars. I
prefer a delay due to latency of other people -- during which I can do
other things -- than pointlessly repeating the arguments over and over
as happened on that particular issue on debian-security@ldo. I was
part of the drift towards a flamewar myself, and don't wish that to
happen anymore.
--
Loïc Minier <lool@dooz.org>
Reply to: