[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Processed: Re: Bug#387049: closed by Loic Minier <lool@dooz.org> (Bug#387049: fixed in meta-gnome2 1:

On Thu, Sep 21, 2006, Joey Hess wrote:
> >  I don't recall having ever threatened you of "enforcement" or with the
> >  "tech-ctte".  I recall I did claim people should bring it to the ctte
> >  if they disagree with my decision at the end of the discussion though,
> >  as I did again lately.
> They were in the mail I replied to.

 You were quoting <[🔎] 20060919200942.GN20244@bee.dooz.org> where I said
 "I'm not too happy that I can't enforce my decision".  This is not
 even remotely threatening of "enforcing" anything towards you or
   I also mentionned the tech-ctte as in: "I really wish my Recommends
 would be honored (or debated in the tech-ctte)", this means I wish that
 the discussion on pulling or not avahi is made by the tech ctte if some
 people object to it; this had nothing to do with discussing the support
 of Recommends in tasksel in the tech-ctte.

 I'm afraid you got me wrong, and I'm sure that if you read the message
 again in this light, you shouldn't see any threat whatsoever.

> The technical committe unfortunatly has a history of delaying and
> complicating issues, and not much of a history of solving them.

 As I said, at least we are not losing time in useless flamewars.  I
 prefer a delay due to latency of other people -- during which I can do
 other things -- than pointlessly repeating the arguments over and over
 as happened on that particular issue on debian-security@ldo.  I was
 part of the drift towards a flamewar myself, and don't wish that to
 happen anymore.

Loïc Minier <lool@dooz.org>

Reply to: