[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: gtk 2.0.x or 2.9+ for etch g-i ? (Was: graphics or text as default)

On 5/16/06, Sebastien Bacher <seb128@debian.org> wrote:
Le mardi 16 mai 2006 à 18:42 +0300, Eddy Petrişor a écrit :

> So the questions are:
> - Is it OK for the GTK+GNOME team to have D-I people (and maybe with
> the help of some gtk/gnome people) build some udebs for GTK
> _with_the_DFB_ backend, as it is now for the 2.0.9 version?

Sure, no objection with that


> So, in English, the main question is if the gtk/gnome people are ok
> with the fact that now, the lead of developing gtk packages will be
> taken by d-i people?

Building some udeb is not exactly taking the lead of the GTK packages,

Well, it is if you look at version numbers ;-) . Also some GTK+DFB
specifc libraries will be needed. AFAICT, now there will be no
conflict on common ground with gtk, but in case that will happen , we
will disscuss the issues with you and we will sort out the problems
that might occur.

> - If teh answer to the previous question is yes, then would you like
> to assist us in this work ? (as we don't have gtk and general library
> packaging experience)

Sure, feel free to mail the debian-gtk-gnome list about any issue you
have on the topic

Thanks for the offer.

"Imagination is more important than knowledge" A.Einstein

Reply to: