[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: gtk 2.0.x or 2.9+ for etch g-i ? (Was: graphics or text as default)

On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 07:36:48PM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Le mardi 16 mai 2006 à 18:42 +0300, Eddy Petrişor a écrit :
> > So the questions are:
> > - Is it OK for the GTK+GNOME team to have D-I people (and maybe with
> > the help of some gtk/gnome people) build some udebs for GTK
> > _with_the_DFB_ backend, as it is now for the 2.0.9 version?
> Sure, no objection with that
> > So, in English, the main question is if the gtk/gnome people are ok
> > with the fact that now, the lead of developing gtk packages will be
> > taken by d-i people?
> Building some udeb is not exactly taking the lead of the GTK packages,
> right?

Well, my proposal was to use the same packaging infrastructure for both
the official 2.8 gtk and the .udeb producing 2.9+ gtk packages, add the
necessary stuff to produce the new -directfb packages, and disable the build
of the normal ones.

it is indeed not taking the lead, but the experience may benefit the gtk team
later on.


Sven Luther

Reply to: