Re: gtk 2.0.x or 2.9+ for etch g-i ? (Was: graphics or text as default)
Eddy Petrişor wrote:
On 5/16/06, Sebastien Bacher <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
Le mardi 16 mai 2006 à 18:42 +0300, Eddy Petrişor a écrit :
> So the questions are:
> - Is it OK for the GTK+GNOME team to have D-I people (and maybe with
> the help of some gtk/gnome people) build some udebs for GTK
> _with_the_DFB_ backend, as it is now for the 2.0.9 version?
Sure, no objection with that
So, if i understand correctly, there should be definitely no problems in
moving to more recent GTKDFB libraries, right (no conflicts with GTKX
pavkages) ? do we all agree about moving to 2.9.0 (needs minor patches)
or CVS snapshot dated 2006-03-26 (previous to 2.9.0 but compiles "out of
GTK <= 2.9.0 requires the following libraries
glib-2.0 >= 2.10.1
atk >= 1.0.1
pango >= 1.9.0
cairo >= 1.1.6
We already have correct glib, atk and pango, but we need to repackage a
newer cairo compiling it with the DirectFB backend enable against DFB
0.9.24 (the detailed GTKDFB packaging process is described here ).
Who's going to do this? in the case we can't do this by ourselves, could
the debian-gnome team, who nicely offered to help us, support us?