On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 12:53:53AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > On Tuesday 14 February 2006 01:29, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > Can you please push the arm -6 udebs into testing now (rather than > > waiting for -7, or worse, staying with -4) since they fix an ARM > > specific problem (in addition to the security issue). > Hmm. I'm don't think we should start pushing udebs before the > corresponding source is in testing; not sure if RMs would agree to that > anyway. The principal reason for concern here is the GPL's source requirement. Given that the newer linux-2.6 package is available from our mirrors anyway, and d-i images tend to linger long after we no longer have the source required to build them directly, I'm not sure it makes a real difference. > Also, it would delay the first build [1], which I'd rather avoid. But you're the boss, in any case. :) > It is however a very strong argument to wait for -7 for the final build. Hurray, gives me more time to get my alpha fixes into kernel-wedge and l-k-di-alpha-2.6 :) Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. vorlon@debian.org http://www.debian.org/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature