On Thursday 27 October 2005 12:28, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote: > i've asked mike emmel if he can update GTKDFB 2.0.9 to solve > GtkTreeView related bugs. > I know backport does not makes sense, but i think this is the fastest > way to get everything working without having to package tons of libs > etc.. (i remember making gtk.so work with already existing official > udebs took a week or so). Hmm. How do you see the implementation of this? Would we need to ask Alastair to include that patch in gtk+2.0-directfb? If the patch can be applied there, this may work. If it needs to be applied elsewhere (in another debian package), I doubt it will be done. I think in principle we should ignore or work around such bugs. We should of course check if any problems we find are still present in 2.6.8, but otherwise I feel we had better list minor issues as "known problems" than take away valuable time from our upstream that could be spent working on the newer version.
Description: PGP signature