John Buttery wrote: > Definitely; that's right up my alley. One of my main ideas is that I > always thought the help text should very explicitly state "this is what > you should put in answer to this question if you don't understand the > question and want the safest answer" In almost all cases, d-i should just make the safe and correct default _be_ the default, instead of resorting to documenting it in the description. Maybe there are one or two exceptions. > of thing...but, I'm not opposed to just doing simple proofreading > without changing the content if that's what the project wants. Is the > goal to lean more toward "professional phrasing" or "informal if it > helps convey the information"? While I do kind of pride myself on being > able to do both at once, sometimes they're a little mutually exclusive. I think we lean toward the latter, but I'm really not sure. -- see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature