On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 07:24:05AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: > > - partman > > Likewise, the plan here is to get it into the installer but with > > a menu item that makes it non-default (like autopartkit) until > > we're comfortable with it. Since it meets requirement I., it can > > go in soon. > However, I find its location in the CVS tree quite strange. Why isn't > it under tools? Seems a pretty minor problem but this needs to be > fixed, imho. > Will we completely drop out fdisks and partitioner or keep it as an > "expert" option? A related question, will the partitioner preferences be decided on a per-architecture basis? There are special considerations on some architectures (e.g., BSD disklabels on alpha, GPT on ia64?) that need to be taken into account before partman can serve as a reasonable default on all ports. I do think that it should soon be able to replace autopartkit altogether, since autopartkit probably also fails on these ports. :) -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
pgpnHHESL8kWD.pgp
Description: PGP signature