Re: base-config CVS relocated
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 09:35:19PM +1100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr> [2003-12-17 00:21]:
> > > You can (and should) just upload a fixed 2.4.22 package in the meantime.
> >
> > Upload a fixed package ? How ? Well, maybe i should upload a version of
>
> How? By making an update to the current version in unstable, use a
> NMU scheme so your uploads waiting to be processed have a higher
> version than this fix.
Mmm, yes, that i could do. I wonder however if this will not cause
problems with the other packages in the NEW queue. I was thinking of
making a sarge security upload trough sarge's testing-proposed-updates.
That said, i would really like it a lot better if the the packages in
the NEW queue would get processed, or at least if i get some reason as
to why they are not. The standard NEW message tells it gets processed
once per week, which is undoubtly a lie, and should better be changed to
something more truthfull.
And then there is the problem with mail going to ftp-masters just
disappearing, without even an aknowledgement. So there is really
_nothing_ i can do about this. Which makes me wonder if my work for
debian is still welcome, and also if Branden's proposal of more strict
control on the delegates would not have been best. Altough i doubt that
it would have changed anything in this case.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Reply to: