Re: About the infinite loop
Tollef Fog Heen wrote on Sat May 04, 2002 um 06:06:38PM:
> | - There is currently no unstable where you can really test new stuff
> | without risking to get it into Testing.
> experimental is meant for this, but I think we need to make it easier
> to run selected packages from experimental, or just expose it more
> than we do today.
IMO we should make unstable be UNSTABLE, and fork a "working"
distribution for pre-release testing. In short, I favorite the
development scheme suggested by Raphael. Doing so, the maintainers could
decide how much testing a package needs, testing would be a REAL testing
three, even for packages like base-config in this case, and "working"
were the real release-candidate.
Wer Stabilität aufgibt, um Benutzerfreundlichkeit zu bekommen, verdient
keins der beiden und bekommt meist auch keins.
-- frei nach B. Franklin
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org