Re: dpkg, udpkg and busybox
Joey Hess wrote:
> Eray Ozkural wrote:
> > Joey Hess wrote:
> > >
> > > Woah, woah. You added support for every field! Why? Udpkg is designed to
> > > be small, not complete! It's not meant to get along with dpkg.
> > >
> > If not, could we please have it not interfere with anything in /var/lib/dpkg?
> It's not intended to be used on a real debian system, why are you doing
I was using /var/lib/dpkg/status.udeb while it was generating an
incompatable status file, but that was half the reason i add full
support, so post install we could use normal packaging tools and upgrade
from existing udebs.
I would have though integrating packing between the install process and
post-install would be pretty important given the installer revolves