Re: not i18ned part in b-f 2.2.15
on "08 Aug 2000 10:19:29 -0400",
with "Re: not i18ned part in b-f 2.2.15",
Adam Di Carlo <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Akira YOSHIYAMA <email@example.com> writes:
> > Surely, we can do with basedisks.sh hacking. But, it makes the script
> > more complex and dirty.
> Are we talking about woody or potato? If woody, then sure, lets find
> a cleaner way to do it. If woody, however, it doesn't matter all that
> much since the system will be gutted very soon, and basedisks.sh will
> cease to exist.
I think I am talking about potato (it may be a point release),
and yes I think the quick and easy hack can be done for potato b-f.
Since the overall rewrite will be done for woody, doing it at this
stage is not effective approach.
Can you provide me a patch to modify basedisks.sh, yosshy ?
> > If we have i18ned console tools, termwrap is a very good choice.
> > It's better than every tool considers terminal emulator for users.
> > And then.... we can merge termwrap and sensible-x-terminal-emulator.
> > It provides us more unified i18n terminal environment.
> Quite. But the woody vs potato argument comes up again. I doubt such
> a change can be made in potato X11 packages at this point.
Maybe not. Anyway, since termwrap has benefit on potato base system,
I think we can work to put it in our boot-floppies.
I have not created my patch to add the support for "language add-on pack"
yet, but I wish to have it for potato...
Taketoshi Sano: <firstname.lastname@example.org>,<email@example.com>,<firstname.lastname@example.org>