Re: not i18ned part in b-f 2.2.15
On Tue, 08 Aug 2000 01:29:02 +0900
Taketoshi Sano <email@example.com> wrote:
> In <firstname.lastname@example.org>,
> on "07 Aug 2000 11:27:48 -0400",
> with "Re: not i18ned part in b-f 2.2.15",
> Adam Di Carlo <email@example.com> wrote:
> > Taketoshi Sano <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > > I think scripts/rootdisk/sbin/termwrap is the way to add it into
> > > just root disk only, without adding the code to put it into
> > > target system as written above.
> > Well, I'm saying, all we have to do is hack basedisks.sh.
> Ah, I had not thought of that.
Surely, we can do with basedisks.sh hacking. But, it makes the script
more complex and dirty.
> > If termwrap is supposed to be in root as well as base, the directory
> > suggested above (well, actually, scripts/rootdisk/prototype/sbin/) is
> > fine. If not, then we should use something like
> > scripts/basedisks/prototype/sbin).
> Well, how do you think, yosshy ? I think that it is enough to have the
> termwrap in base system only. Do you think that it will add some value
> on our b-f to have the termwrap on the root disk ?
Now we not native english speakers want:
+setting LC_ALL or LANG.
+executing a suitable terminal emulator.
And we can add other functions to it. Easy!
If we have i18ned console tools, termwrap is a very good choice.
It's better than every tool considers terminal emulator for users.
And then.... we can merge termwrap and sensible-x-terminal-emulator.
It provides us more unified i18n terminal environment.
Akira Yoshiyama <email@example.com>