Re: not i18ned part in b-f 2.2.15
Akira YOSHIYAMA <email@example.com> writes:
> Surely, we can do with basedisks.sh hacking. But, it makes the script
> more complex and dirty.
Are we talking about woody or potato? If woody, then sure, lets find
a cleaner way to do it. If woody, however, it doesn't matter all that
much since the system will be gutted very soon, and basedisks.sh will
cease to exist.
> If we have i18ned console tools, termwrap is a very good choice.
> It's better than every tool considers terminal emulator for users.
> And then.... we can merge termwrap and sensible-x-terminal-emulator.
> It provides us more unified i18n terminal environment.
Quite. But the woody vs potato argument comes up again. I doubt such
a change can be made in potato X11 packages at this point.
.....Adam Di Carlo....adam@onShore.com.....<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>