Re: state of boot floppies
Randolph Chung <email@example.com> writes:
> > What else are you talking about? Is anyone working on it? Robust
> > kernel-source and build cycle is in our interest to have...
> I think the only thing we really need are pcmcia-modules that are built
> against the kernel-image-2.2.14 source in incoming, and the
> kernel-image-2.2.14-compact source. The problem is that because our kernels
> use modversions, everytime a kernel is updated we need to recompile pcmcia
> stuff. i think this is really annoying, but i'm assuming there is a reason
> we use modversions...
Yes -- but inherent in PCMCIA is very tight coupling between the
kernel config and the pcmcia config. In fact, in 2.4.x, PCMCIA ships
with the kernel so the pcmcia-modules-* package will probably go away.
> > Argh. Is this so for compact as well as the stock images?
> yes. i can rebuild some debs for us to build 2.2.5. How about if we worry
> about getting them into the archive proper later, after it's tested and we
> are sure they work?
I don't understand --- why is there any reason *not* to upload the
kernel-image-2.2.14-compact images to potato *now*? I don't think
there is any reason. As for "being tested" -- it will be tested far
more once you have uploaded it to the standard place (Incoming).
So please upload proper 2.2.14-compact pkgs if at all possible.
.....Adam Di Carlo....adam@onShore.com.....<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>