Hi Ole, On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 09:28:32PM +0100, Ole Streicher wrote: > I just uploaded 0.6.101 to experimental (code is in the "experimental > branch); could everyone please have a look. UDD is not implemented yet. [..] > Debian Astro and Debian Edu (both without the Depends->Recommends > lowering) work, when the line > > Format: https://blends.debian.org/blends/1.1 > > was inserted as the first line in each task with > > $ sed -i '1i Format: https://blends.debian.org/blends/1.1' tasks/* > > In Debian Edu, the generated dependcy lists differ significantly from > what is checked in, but I have no idea why this is. Looking into the > tasks lists, they look fine. The education-* Buster meta-packages differ a lot from the Stretch ones. - A lot of superfluous Depends. (Only one additionally needed in Jessie: gosa-plugin-netgroups via some hackish trick.) - No evaluation of the missinglist packages. (Packages kept as recommended dispite beeing unavailable.) Just for testing I reworked the Debian Edu tasks files (basically s/Depends/Recommends/g). Using these files, this seem to work: - Using added (forced) depends. - Dropping the education-all package. - Correctly de-promoting non-available packages from Recommends to Suggests. - Correctly de-promoting contrib and non-free packages (only added for testing purposes) from Recommends to Suggests. I don't have more time atm (and the results should be confirmed by others). Thanks for your work. Wolfgang
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature