On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 10:06 PM, Andreas Tille <
andreas@an3as.eu> wrote:
>
> Hi Akshita,
>
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 07:37:52PM +0530, Akshita Jha wrote:
> >
> > Yes, the prepared query - query_vcs does reflect this. I had rewritten the
> > query to fetch information from blends_prospective packages.
>
> What exactly did you intended with the rewrite?
>
I was just testing some things (for my own curiosity) and I forgot to revert to the original for the final commit. My bad.
> > I have changed
> > it to use the existing query_vcs. The version is now present for
> > prospective packages.
>
> Hmmm, I can not see the citations for the example package express.
>
I have not added the citations information yet. I'll add it as soon as possible. I have just added 'version' for prospective packages now.
> Moreover I realised that the old implementation of "Versions and Archs"
> is not the way I described before. I think there ordering is
>
> ORDER BY version, release
>
> (See for instance bwa package in bio)
>
> I admit I'm not very proud upon this since it looks a bit mixed but for
> the sake of comparison it makes sense if you may be also simply use the
> original query (or at least the ordering.
Ok. So, initially I was using the already prepared queries - qurey_pkgs, query_new and now query_vcs as it is (without changing anything). Still there was a difference in Version and Archs of the tasks files that were generated from tasks_udd.py and tasks.py files. I'll recheck if I've missed something and let you know/