[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [GsoC] your latest commit of tasks_udd.py



Hi Akshita,

On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 04:19:23PM +0530, Akshita Jha wrote:
> > Could you please check further diffs and find explanations or ways to
> > remove them?  I'll go offline now and will not be available until
> > tomorrow noon.
> 
> I checked the diffs. I found that the version of prospective package is
> missing ( is this information present in UDD ? )

Yes, it is in the field chlog_version (since it is obtained from the
version in the last changelog entry).  The query of the old code should
somehow reflect this.

> and the citations are not
> present for any of the packages (but according to [0], the publication data
> is not needed ). If there is anything else, you find missing please let me
> know.

There are two ways to specify publication data:

   1. in debian/upstream/metadata
       -> if prospective package keep this in VCS UDD has (or should have!)
          the information

   2. inside the tasks files
       -> we stop supporting this

I'll give an example for 1.:  The package express in in the Debian Med task
bio in new.  It has obviously citation information:

   select * from bibref where source = 'express';

This should be displayed on the website.  I think I went through all
Debian Med tasks and moved citations to debian/upstream/metadata if the
package is in VCS.

Just let me know if something might remain unclear.

Kind regards

      Andreas.

> [0] https://lists.debian.org/debian-blends/2015/05/msg00057.html

-- 
http://fam-tille.de


Reply to: