Re: redmine depends on ruby-awesome-nested-set, which is not available
* Antonio Terceiro <firstname.lastname@example.org> [2014-07-21 03:06:36 CEST]:
> On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 08:12:08PM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> > - make ruby-awesome-nested-set reach testing, and backport it.
> > - uploaded a fixed redmine to wheezy-backports
> > So the question to backports FTP masters is: even though redmine is not
> > present in testing right now because rails 3.2 won't be shipped in
> > jessie, would you be willing to allow uploading a redmine
> > 2.5.1-2~bpo70+2 that fixes dependencies so that it uses rails and rack
> > packages from wheezy?
> Actually, would you guys allow backporting ruby-awesome-nested-set,
> which should not be in testing for a while, as well? The transition to
> using Rails 4 in testing/unstable is going to take a while, and I would
> like to be able to fix redmine in wheezy-backports in that interim.
So would the ruby-awesome-nested-set work without ruby-3.2? If so,
could you upload it to unstable so that it doesn't depend on ruby-3.2
and transition to jessie? I would guess you want to have it in jessie,
just having ruby-3.2 blocked from jessie?
Actually I don't really understand why ruby-3.2 wasn't uploaded to
experimental then to have minimal impact on the testing transition for
other ruby packages, but then I guess that's your decision as a whole.
Fühlst du dich mutlos, fass endlich Mut, los |
Fühlst du dich hilflos, geh raus und hilf, los | Wir sind Helden
Fühlst du dich machtlos, geh raus und mach, los | 23.55: Alles auf Anfang
Fühlst du dich haltlos, such Halt und lass los |