Re: whatmaps 0.0.6-1~bpo70+1 bugs
On 10.06.2014 11:08, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
Micha Lenk <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
Thanks for reporting these issues back. Unless the bugs are specific
to the backports distribution (e.g. wheezy-backports) the usual
process to get them fixed in backports is to fix them via unstable and
so the first answer on
is wrong advice?
Doesn't it make sense for bugs that affect also testing or unstable to
report them in testing/unstable? So, yes, I would say the first answer
on the backports FAQ is at least misleading in this regard. On the other
hand it was not wrong either to bring the issue up here as the backports
were affected too. So, thanks a again for reporting.
As these bugs do not look like they are specific to wheezy-backports,
have they already been reported to the BTS? If yes: which bug numbers?
I did now for two issues: #751087 and #751088
Thanks a lot.
The dependency problem seems fixed in the mean time.