Re: whatmaps 0.0.6-1~bpo70+1 bugs

[Robert Bihlmeyer <r.bihlmeyer@arrowecs.at>]

Hi,

Micha Lenk <micha@debian.org> writes:

> Thanks for reporting these issues back. Unless the bugs are specific
> to the backports distribution (e.g. wheezy-backports) the usual
> process to get them fixed in backports is to fix them via unstable and
> testing first.

so the first answer on 
http://backports.debian.org/FAQ/
is wrong advice?

> As these bugs do not look like they are specific to wheezy-backports,
> have they already been reported to the BTS? If yes: which bug numbers?

I did now for two issues: #751087 and #751088

The dependency problem seems fixed in the mean time.

br,
-- 
Robert Bihlmeyer    ASSIST    Arrow ECS Internet Security AG