Jens Schüßler <jgs@trash.net> writes: > * Ben Armstrong <synrg@sanctuary.nslug.ns.ca> wrote: >> On 31/10/12 08:52 AM, Jens Schüßler wrote: >> > http://backports-master.debian.org/FAQ/ >> >> In light of that, wouldn't it be better to remove the older, insecure >> mozilla releases rather than leaving them there, exposing users to risk? > > Sounds reasonable. iceweasel_10.0.10esr-1 is on mozilla.debian.net since > Oct.26 and I see no real benefit for parallel having iceweasel_10 in the > backports.debian.org repo when m.d.n offers those backports also. I don't think this is a good idea. Those people who have already installed the backport won't get notified that the package was removed From there and that they should use a different source to get security updates. The only safe way is to fix the backport. -- .''`. Sébastien Villemot : :' : Debian Developer `. `' http://www.dynare.org/sebastien `- GPG Key: 4096R/381A7594
Attachment:
pgprFEHkOFEUO.pgp
Description: PGP signature