Re: Pidgin with version patch
* Marko Randjelovic <marel@sbb.rs> [2008-07-21 11:48:37 CEST]:
> Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> > You can find my try on <http://rhonda.deb.at/htdocs/debian/pidgin/>.
>
> Why I get this message? "Sorry, but the requested page
> http://rhonda.deb.at/htdocs/debian/pidgin/ could not be found on rhonda.deb.at."
That's because I deleted it because I noticed that libsilc is in
backports already and don't want people to use that broken build. ;)
> I made my try, using the same modifications that were used to backport 2.3.1.
> When I tried to upgrade the packages, I got the error:
>
> main:/usr/src/debian-mr/pidgin-2.4.3-testing# dpkg -i
> libpurple0_2.4.3-2~bpo40+1_amd64.deb pidgin-data_2.4.3-2~bpo40+1_all.deb
> pidgin_2.4.3-2~bpo40+1_amd64.deb
> dpkg: considering removing pidgin-data in favour of libpurple0 ...
> dpkg: no, cannot remove pidgin-data (--auto-deconfigure will help):
> pidgin depends on pidgin-data (<< 2.3.1-z)
> pidgin-data is to be removed.
> dpkg: regarding libpurple0_2.4.3-2~bpo40+1_amd64.deb containing libpurple0:
> libpurple0 conflicts with pidgin-data (<< 2.4.0-1)
> pidgin-data (version 2.3.1-2~bpo40+1) is installed.
> dpkg: error processing libpurple0_2.4.3-2~bpo40+1_amd64.deb (--install):
> conflicting packages - not installing libpurple0
That's really strange and shouldn't happen if you install them like you
did *ponders*
> I don't know if I made some mistake.
Me neither, let me build my test packages and testinstall them :)
> My libltdl3-dev is from bpo and I can't downgrade it. Is it a problem?
Shouldn't be, wouldn't think so.
> In .changes files, my name is stated as Changed-By. Is this OK? They wrote in
> the Mentors FAQ <http://people.debian.org/~mpalmer/debian-mentors_FAQ.html>
>
> "Make sure your name isn't in the Maintainer: or Changed-By: headers of the
> .changes file."
Erm, that's about "process for sponsoring a package", not about the
people actually doing the changes. :)
Will get back to you once I figured out what's the problem with
xulrunner for unstable on powerpc is - unfortunately (for you) this is
something more severe for myself and the project, me thinks.
So long,
Rhonda
Reply to: