Re: moreutils in sarge-backports newer than in etch
> > Nikita V. Youshchenko schrieb am Montag, den 16. April 2007:
> > > > ..can, will or should anything be done about this?
> > > >
> > > > As etch is released now, it won't likely get a moreutils-0.20...
> > > > But I guess those who have already installed 0.20~bpo1 can't be
> > > > helped by a change in the bpo archive anyhow...
> > >
> > > I think that sarge-backports archive should be split into two.
> > > One for systems that are intended to be upgraded to etch somewhen
> > > later. This part should not have any packages newer than etch has.
> > > Other for systems are not intended to be upgraded to etch. This one
> > > may have things from current testing.
> > We discussed this and the short answer is no. We don't want to
> > administrate another suite. You will have to live with the problem
> > that from now on sarge-bpo may destory your upgrade path to etch. I
> > currently don't see any other solution.
> Does having 3 suits (sarge-backports-from-testing,
> sarge-backports-from-etch, etch-backports-from-testing) add any
> difficulty that having 2 suits (sarge-backports-from-testing,
> etch-backports-from-testing) does not have?
> Or there are no plans even for 3 suits?
I mean, for 2 suits