[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Problems debootstrapping armhf



Hector Oron wrote:
Hello,

2011/10/15 peter green <peter.green@postgrad.manchester.ac.uk>:

# debootstrap --foreign --arch=armhf
--keyring=/usr/share/keyrings/debian-ports-archive-keyring.gpg sid .
http://ftp.debian-ports.org/debian >However, the resulting file system does
not seem to contain a dpkg executable
I don't know for sure why it didn't end up in there but I suspect it's due
to there being no armhf binary of the current unstable version (at least
there doesn't appear to be one).

It is on 'unreleased' suite due to a dpkg bug preventing to bootstrap
armhf with multistrap (uses multiple repositories for bootstrapping).
A fixed dpkg will be in 'unstable' suite as soon as its built as it
has already been uploaded a new version with the fix in it.
Does debian-ports.org remove binaries from unstable if a newer version is uploaded to unreleased or something? because there has certainly been a dpkg in armhf unstable in the past but there doesn't seem to be right now.

root@debian:~# chroot /chroots/sid-armhf/ (this chroot hadn't been updated for a while)
root@debian:/# apt-cache policy dpkg
dpkg:
 Installed: 1.16.0.3
 Candidate: 1.16.0.3
 Version table:
*** 1.16.0.3 0
       500 http://ftp.debian-ports.org/debian/ sid/main armhf Packages
       100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
root@debian:/# apt-get update Get:1 http://ftp.uk.debian.org sid InRelease [146 kB]
<snip>
Ign http://ftp.debian-ports.org unreleased/main Translation-en Fetched 13.6 MB in 2min 7s (107 kB/s) Reading package lists... Done
root@debian:/# apt-cache policy dpkg
dpkg:
 Installed: 1.16.0.3
 Candidate: 1.16.1+armhf.1
 Version table:
    1.16.1+armhf.1 0
500 http://ftp.debian-ports.org/debian/ unreleased/main armhf Packages
*** 1.16.0.3 0
       100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
root@debian:/#
You might want to read the bug report as it will hint you on how you
can easily bootstrap with an alternative to debootstrap, multistrap:
  <http://bugs.debian.org/644492>

Kind regards,


Reply to: