Re: 64-bit java plugin (or lack thereof)

To: Corey Hickey <bugfood-ml@fatooh.org>
Cc: debian-amd64@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: 64-bit java plugin (or lack thereof)
From: Juergen Kreileder <jk@blackdown.de>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 21:22:56 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 87psrvqlf3.fsf@blackdown.de>
Mail-followup-to: Corey Hickey <bugfood-ml@fatooh.org>, debian-amd64@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 4314AAA7.4090400@fatooh.org> (Corey Hickey's message of "Tue, 30 Aug 2005 11:51:19 -0700")
References: <[🔎] 43115591.90708@fatooh.org> <f42ef1690508280641432b3b37@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 4312206F.5040203@fatooh.org> <[🔎] 87y86lo9na.fsf@julius-net.net> <[🔎] 4314AAA7.4090400@fatooh.org>

Corey Hickey <bugfood-ml@fatooh.org> writes:

> Now, my question at this point is: would it be more productive to
> file a bug in the Debian BTS or in the mozilla.org bugzilla?

It's a known Mozilla bug, the OJI code isn't completely 64-bit safe.

I have patch which fixes that for older Mozilla versions.  I'll update
it for recent version and release it when I find some spare time.

        Juergen

-- 
Juergen Kreileder, Blackdown Java-Linux Team
http://blog.blackdown.de/

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: 64-bit java plugin (or lack thereof)
  - From: Corey Hickey <bugfood-ml@fatooh.org>

References:
- 64-bit java plugin (or lack thereof)
  - From: Corey Hickey <bugfood-ml@fatooh.org>
- Re: 64-bit java plugin (or lack thereof)
  - From: Corey Hickey <bugfood-ml@fatooh.org>
- Re: 64-bit java plugin (or lack thereof)
  - From: Matthias Julius <lists@julius-net.net>
- Re: 64-bit java plugin (or lack thereof)
  - From: Corey Hickey <bugfood-ml@fatooh.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Acer 5024WLMI and wireless
Next by Date: Re: Acer 5024WLMI and wireless
Previous by thread: Re: 64-bit java plugin (or lack thereof)
Next by thread: Re: 64-bit java plugin (or lack thereof)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread