[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: fam problems

Hi Graham,

El jue, 16-06-2005 a las 11:07 +0100, Graham Smith escribió:

> which I thought "yeah great that looks about right, Gamin really is a 
> drop in replacement for fam". Just after it got the packages though apt 
> comes back with the stuff below (a list of about 100 packages that 
> depend on libfam0c102). Correctly me if I am wrong here but I thought 
> apt was supposed to resolve dependency issues _before_ installing and 
> removing packages.
> dpkg: libfam0c102: dependency problems, but removing anyway as you request:
>   kaboodle depends on libfam0c102.
>   ksnapshot depends on libfam0c102.
>   kmoon depends on libfam0c102.

There's nothing wrong with that as far as I can tell. It just happens
that it has to install libfam before installing libgamin, thus it warns
you that for a moment the dependencies will be broken.

> PS Is there some technical reason why none of the Debian mailing lists 
> don't set the Reply-To header?

I think this has been quoted on this list in the past:
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html .

Javier Kohen <jkohen@users.sourceforge.net>
ICQ: blashyrkh #2361802
Jabber: jkohen@jabber.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to: