[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: gcc-3.4 to unstable for amd64?

* John Goerzen (jgoerzen@complete.org) wrote:
> On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 05:06:05PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > * John Goerzen (jgoerzen@complete.org) wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 10:41:02PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> > > > 3. is pure64 going to be included in sarge?
> > > 
> > > No.
> > 
> > Honestly, I'm not entirely sure I agree with this, but it does seem
> > unlikely atm. ;)
> IF we get mirror space, which I've been told flatly won't happen until
> after sarge, 

That's just obnoxious. ;)

> and we get debian-installer working, 

There's been at least *some* work on this. :)

> and we get
> official autobuilders integrated with the buildd system, 

Yea, so, we can get autobuilders set up, but it's a little hard for them
to be official without having mirror space, aiui.  I'm not exactly sure
how we're supposted to handle *that*.

> and we get a
> stable, usable system, 

This isn't that far away I don't think...

> and do all of that in time for sarge, then we can
> release with it.  I think that these are all extremely small fractions
> multiplied together so much that the answer is so close to 0 as to be
> practically the same :-)

The only thing that I really see as holding us up here is the mirror
space.  The rest doesn't seem like it'd be all that difficult to do in
time for sarge.  This actually makes it very annoying because there
doesn't seem to be much movement on the mirror space issue, and it
doesn't appear to be a technical problem that we can solve (if nothing
else, the problem hasn't been explained properly yet).


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: