Re: gcc-3.4 to unstable for amd64?
On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 10:41:02PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> I have some questions:
> 1. when does the gcc maintainer team plan to release 3.4 to unstable?
> 2. will gcc-3.4 be included in sarge?
> 3. is pure64 going to be included in sarge?
> gcc-3.4 will become default after the release, why should we not already
> build everything with gcc-3.4, since it produces faster code?
I'm not sure that performance is itself a good enough rationale to
justify breaking from all the other archs in sid.