[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: gclcvs, Re: gw.wurtel.net

On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 10:46:02PM -0400, Camm Maguire wrote:
> Greetings, and thanks!  But I cannot reproduce on pergolesi
> sid_amd64_pure dchroot either.

That chroot doesn't appear to have the current unstable version of binutils.
Have you tested that gclcvs even builds on i386 with this binutils?

> If there is an issue here, I suspect that gcc doesn't want an empty
> map file on input anymore.  Used to be the map option would not work
> unless the file already existed.

The map file used in my alpha test build wasn't empty.

> > On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 11:48:00AM -0400, Camm Maguire wrote:
> > > Greetings! And thank you again so much for keeping this machine available.
> > 
> > > I have no problem building gclcvs here, but the autobuilders show
> > 
> > > http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=gclcvs;ver=2.7.0-68;arch=alpha;stamp=1178601357
> > 
> > > and we still have no official debian alpha machine available for
> > > testing :-(.
> > 
> > FWIW, with linux-libc-dev installed I get a failure because asm/system.h is
> > no longer being shipped.
> > 
> > After fixing that bug (by directly including the definitions in gclcvs,
> > since asm/system.h doesn't look to me like anything the kernel has an
> > obligation to export), I seem to get the same build failure on alpha that's
> > affecting amd64, hppa, mips, mipsel, powerpc, and sparc in unstable (ld
> > segfault with -Wl,-Map).

Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
vorlon@debian.org                                   http://www.debian.org/

Reply to: