Re: libc6 vs libc6.1
James Troup <J.J.Troup@scm.brad.ac.uk> writes:
> That's fair enough, but could libc6.1-dev not Provide: libc6-dev?
> That way there would be no need for nasty alpha-specific hacks to the
> debian/rules and debian/control of every package that depends on
> libc6-dev.
Of course, that would require someone to be able to see the forest for
the trees.
Which is to say that that's an excellent suggestion, and I shall look
into getting Dale appropriate diffs immediately.
Mike.
--
Michael Alan Dorman | E-Mail: mdorman@law.miami.edu
Network Administrator | Phone: (305) 284-2463
University of Miami School of Law | Fax: (305) 284-3753
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-alpha-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: