Re: libc6 vs libc6.1
James Troup <J.J.Troup@scm.brad.ac.uk> writes:
> That's fair enough, but could libc6.1-dev not Provide: libc6-dev?
> That way there would be no need for nasty alpha-specific hacks to the
> debian/rules and debian/control of every package that depends on
Of course, that would require someone to be able to see the forest for
Which is to say that that's an excellent suggestion, and I shall look
into getting Dale appropriate diffs immediately.
Michael Alan Dorman | E-Mail: email@example.com
Network Administrator | Phone: (305) 284-2463
University of Miami School of Law | Fax: (305) 284-3753
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org .